365Runners
Welcome to 365Runners! We are here because we all share a running addiction. Whether training for a first marathon, a new PR, a new race distance, or anything else... welcome!

To stop the banner ads, please register and login. Otherwise, please enjoy browsing as a guest.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

365Runners
Welcome to 365Runners! We are here because we all share a running addiction. Whether training for a first marathon, a new PR, a new race distance, or anything else... welcome!

To stop the banner ads, please register and login. Otherwise, please enjoy browsing as a guest.
365Runners
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Father Time..............

+2
JohnP
mountandog
6 posters

Go down

Father Time.............. Empty Father Time..............

Post  mountandog Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:02 pm

Came accross this website, which I'm sure has been discovered before. Not sure its exactly the same as the WMA Age-grading Calulator, but it does present similar results in a different format. The researcher is actually an economist at Yale.

According to some other research you lose about 1 beat of Max HR per year which causes the slow but inevitable decline.

But here is my commentary:

Firstly, I think this table probably works well for those who ran marathons in their 20's and 30's and PR'd at that age. I'd be curious as to those of you who have been running for years if you've followed the trendline since reaching your PR.

Secondly, for people like me who started running late in life (me at age 52), I'm still improving and setting PRs -- but for how long? Essentially I have to get faster by 90 seconds per year to breakeven. At what point do the two lines intersect?

http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/aging/runoth.htm
mountandog
mountandog
Explaining To Spouse
Explaining To Spouse

Posts : 1398
Points : 7906
Join date : 2011-07-14
Age : 67
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

Father Time.............. Empty Re: Father Time..............

Post  JohnP Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:48 pm

Based on this, in 13 years, my PR equivalent time will be a four hour marathon. Though I didn't run that in my first marathon, I would consider that coming full cycle for me.
JohnP
JohnP
Explaining To Spouse
Explaining To Spouse

Posts : 1226
Points : 6585
Join date : 2011-06-15

Back to top Go down

Father Time.............. Empty Re: Father Time..............

Post  Mark B Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:23 pm

It's amazing how long the tail goes on that curve, isn't it?

Unless you examine it a little too closely and draw conclusions like I did. Based on the times, in the year between my PR in the marathon and my time one year later, I aged 19 years!

I've heard about "dog years," but that's just wrong. jocolor
Mark B
Mark B
Needs A Life
Needs A Life

Posts : 8143
Points : 19854
Join date : 2011-06-15
Age : 60
Location : Vancouver, Wash.

Back to top Go down

Father Time.............. Empty Re: Father Time..............

Post  ssilvert Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:49 am

Sometimes you can surprise yourself as you age. Nobody expects an elite runner to set PR's at age 38, but that's exactly what US Olympian Magdalena Lewy-Boulet has done. Just this year at age 38 she set PR's at both 5,000 and 10,000 meters. And, she set her half and full marathon PR's in the previous two years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magdalena_Lewy-Boulet

Stan


ssilvert
ssilvert
Poster
Poster

Posts : 173
Points : 4868
Join date : 2011-08-12
Age : 56
Location : Atlanta

Back to top Go down

Father Time.............. Empty Re: Father Time..............

Post  T Miller Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:56 am

ssilvert wrote:Sometimes you can surprise yourself as you age. Nobody expects an elite runner to set PR's at age 38, but that's exactly what US Olympian Magdalena Lewy-Boulet has done. Just this year at age 38 she set PR's at both 5,000 and 10,000 meters. And, she set her half and full marathon PR's in the previous two years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magdalena_Lewy-Boulet

Stan

So, If I can hit my goal in Chicago then I can trim 7 years off of my age? I like that chart.
T Miller
T Miller
Regular
Regular

Posts : 782
Points : 5855
Join date : 2011-06-15
Age : 59
Location : Bloomington

Back to top Go down

Father Time.............. Empty Re: Father Time..............

Post  Michael Enright Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:13 am

I ran my first marathon at 50 (almost 51), and that first one is still my PR! Maybe this explains that problem, though I note that I've beaten this predictor in subsequent marathons, including twice last year (but I still did not PR) - next one I run (10/30) I will be 54, within a few days of 55, so we'll see how I do this time! But I presume you're right, this tool was not modeled for somebody who started so late...
Michael Enright
Michael Enright
Explaining To Spouse
Explaining To Spouse

Posts : 1521
Points : 6850
Join date : 2011-06-16
Age : 67
Location : Portland, CT

Back to top Go down

Father Time.............. Empty Re: Father Time..............

Post  mountandog Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:14 am

I like the chart too, I can still break 4 hours at 80!!

Everyone's anecdotal tales here indicate that improvement is still possible even after the age of 35, but I would guess that's because we are more of the serious recreational type. Still learning and still improving. However, I would be willing to bet that overall this curve applies to the elites who tend to peak in their early 30s. Of course there are deviations to the norm, but I think this curve might hold some water.

If I recall correctly, didn't the book "Born to Run" make a statement along the lines of (not a direct quote): Distance runners continue to improve until their late 20s and then begin a gradual decline, but the curve down is more gradual than the curve up, so much so that a 63 year old has the same projected time as a 19 yr old". I remember something along those lines, and this curve would suggest much the same thing. I wish the curve went younger than 35 as I would like to see the improvement slope as well.

I note in the beginning the factors apply to most distances, include swimming and is only male, that women decline at a different rate. Interesting.
mountandog
mountandog
Explaining To Spouse
Explaining To Spouse

Posts : 1398
Points : 7906
Join date : 2011-07-14
Age : 67
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

Father Time.............. Empty Re: Father Time..............

Post  mountandog Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:16 am

Michael Enright wrote:I ran my first marathon at 50 (almost 51), and that first one is still my PR! Maybe this explains that problem, though I note that I've beaten this predictor in subsequent marathons, including twice last year (but I still did not PR) - next one I run (10/30) I will be 54, within a few days of 55, so we'll see how I do this time! But I presume you're right, this tool was not modeled for somebody who started so late...

I turn 55 on Nov 8. We're close in age. Looking forward to the new age bracket and competing against those oldsters. Smile
mountandog
mountandog
Explaining To Spouse
Explaining To Spouse

Posts : 1398
Points : 7906
Join date : 2011-07-14
Age : 67
Location : Michigan

Back to top Go down

Father Time.............. Empty Re: Father Time..............

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum